Republic’s 1940 feature Women in War is rare enough that you won’t
ever happen upon it on television, and are unlikely to see it at all short of a
concentrated effort to do so. It tallies a mere 15 votes on IMDb, alongside
three user reviews, two of which are by fellow completist Arne Anderson
— one of which reports that the film is utterly unavailable, the second written after
he managed to track it down — as I recently did. After years of wistfully
staring at this title on my to-see lists, I was awfully disappointed by it when
I finally got the chance.
Set in Britain in the heady early
days of the conflict, Women in War
tells the story of Pamela Starr (Wendy Barrie), a party girl charged with
manslaughter after shoving a drunken RAF pilot over a balcony. Pamela’s
long-lost mother, Matron O’Neil (familiar-face Elsie Janis), now in charge of
the nurses’ corps, secretly engineers a deal with the courts in the hope that by
taking her tough-cookie daughter into the war effort, she can provide the
affection and discipline needed to allow her to turn the corner. But the chip
on Pamela’s shoulder just grows larger after the other new nurses, who remember
only the newspaper gossip from her trial, spurn her. Pamela copes by striking
up a casual romance with another flier, Larry (Patric Knowles), which only makes
things even worse for her in the barracks — he’s already engaged to Gail
(Mae Clarke), one of her fellow nurses. Isolated and bitter, Pamela’s refuses
to stop seeing Larry, and their relationship grows to the point that he decides
to leave Gail, who retaliates by trying to kill Pamela during a midnight trip
to the front lines. Huddled underneath an intense artillery barrage (the
filming of which earned an Academy Award nomination for Special Effects), the
two women retreat to the cellar of a church, while O’Neil searches frantically
for them amidst the cascading shells…
Women in War
is emblematic of the naïvely casual and overly romanticized outlook the
movie-going public had in those months of 1939 and early 1940 that historians
now refer to as the “phony war,” before Dunkirk, when the situation changed dramatically. During the very same week that this film was released to
theatres, global newspaper headlines told the horrific story of the British
Expeditionary Force’s chaotic evacuation from France, which forced the public to reformulate
its attitude and its commitment to the total war effort. It’s unlikely that
a film such as this, which employs a wartime milieu without the gravity it demanded, would have even been made had it been scheduled for production just a
few months later. The spate of nursing pictures — even the overtly
romantic ones — that would soon issue from the studios went out
of their way to not only demonstrate the value of nurses, but also the incredible risk and
toil required to be one.
The film does lip service to
realities of war, as early on O’Neil tells her recruits:
“I hope none of you have come here with the beautiful notion that war is noble and romantic. Some of you dewy-eyed creatures may be under the impression that it will be your function to soothe the fevered brows of handsome young men when on duty, and to philander with the convalescents when you’re off. Unfortunately, war isn’t like that.”
Yet that seems to be
precisely the notion that all of the nurses have, and the film does nothing to dispel
them. There are no wounded soldiers to tend to, no tragedies along the way, and
no sour news from other fronts. The war seems terribly far away, if it’s even happening at all. All our nurses have time to do is
chase fliers, and all they have to be concerned with are the most immature
aspects of their schoolgirl romances. The film’s finale is its most damning
sequence: When the nurses are ordered to drive desperately needed medical
supplies to the front, Gail — our ‘woman scorned’ — childishly
forsakes her duty in order to exact revenge on Pamela. She diverts their
vehicle into an evacuated French village that is under heavy bombardment,
hoping to get them both killed. When O’Neil realizes what has happened, she too
drives her truck into the village — showing audiences that as far as these
nurses are concerned, the needs of the wounded on the front lines finish a
distant second to their own personal drama. And when the shells really start
dropping, too many of the nurses lapse into hysterics.
In June 1940 the Battle of Britain was in the offing, and the terrifying nights of the Blitz would then follow. It was a time when English and Canadians — and soon Americans — of all ages and from all walks of life were asked to make extraordinary
sacrifices on behalf of their nations and one another. Women in War is a shallow film that fails to measure up to the requirements of its time. Its women are shallow,
silly, and incompetent rather than confident, devoted, and strong. When inspiration was needed, it stooped merely to entertain.
Women in War (1940)
Directed by John Auer
Starring Wendy Barrie, Mae Clarke, and Elsie Janis
Released by Republic Pictures
Running time: 71 minutes
Availability: very rare
Grade: D
No comments:
Post a Comment